• Home
  • Statement Of Faith
  • Contact Us
  • Services
    • Schedule
  • Sermons by Occasion
    • Sunday Evening Message
    • Special Meetings
    • Sunday Morning Message
  • Sermons by Minister
    • Allen Myers
    • Anthony Gingerich
    • Ben Miller
    • Brian Yoder
    • Calvin Yoder
    • Carl Heatwole
    • Dale Eby
    • Dan Freed
    • Daryl Witmer
    • Delvin Yoder
    • Dr. Nolan Byler
    • Duane Nisly
    • Edward Yoder
    • Eli Yoder
    • Eric Oberholzer
    • Freeman Miller
    • Gabriel Yoder
    • Galen Yoder
    • Glenn Horst
    • Ivan Weaver
    • Jake Troyer
    • Japheth Stauffer
    • Jay Rohrer
    • Jeff Yoder
    • Jerrill Schrock
    • Joe Miller
    • John D Martin
    • John Waldron
    • Josh Good
    • Ken Ranck
    • Kyle Stoltzfus
    • Leon Yoder
    • Lowell Yoder
    • Mark Yoder
    • Melvin Lehman
    • Merle Burkholder
    • Merle Yoder
    • Michael Yoder
    • Milo Zehr
    • Nathan Bange
    • Nathan Good
    • Phil Beiler
    • Raun Schrock
    • Rich Bowman
    • Ricky Bowman
    • Sam Troyer
    • Sonny Yoder
    • Steve Yoder
    • Wayne Schrock
    • Wesley King
    • William Byler

Bethel Mennonite Church - Gladys VA

A Conservative Christian Church (and podcast)

Anabaptist View of Church/State Relationship

July 9, 2023

https://bmcgladys.com/wp-content/uploads/SermonAudio/2023/2023.07.09-anabaptist-view-church-state-milo-zehr.mp3

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 54:28 — 18.7MB)

Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Android | TuneIn | RSS

We find five different positions on the church/state relationship in 16th-century Anabaptism.

Medieval: The church and society are the same thing. This is the view of all groups in 1500 and the view even of the Swiss Brethren prior to January 1525.

Radical dualism, as represented by the Schleitheim Confession of 1527: This is the view that there are two kingdoms, the kingdom of God and the kingdom of the devil, and believers should not participate in the kingdom of the devil.

Provisional pacifism, represented by Hut and Hoffman: These men believed that Christ would destroy his enemies upon His return and that believers would participate in this defeat of the wicked. In the meantime, believers should wait patiently and obey civil government.

Full Participation – Hubmaier, whose position was much like early Grebel/Zurich and Luther or Zwingli. Hubmaier’s goal was to make Anabaptism the official religion. He believed that the Christian cause should be sanctioned and supported by an evangelical or regenerate magistracy. The true Christian must support the state for his own good and the good of others. Because of this view, Hubmaier allowed the use of the sword by Christians as an act of obedience to the state. He also talked about “just government” and suggested that only a just government deserved obedience. He also said that a person should disobey the government when asked to do evil. He thought a Christian could hold government office.

Thomas Müntzer, more than any other person, is the reason Martin Luther became completely opposed to the Anabaptist movement. In the spring of 1525, he led the peasants in an armed revolt against well-armed nobles in what became known as The Great Peasant’s War (1524-1525). Thousands of peasants were killed, and Müntzer was captured, tortured, and executed.

Münster (1531-1535): Münster is a city where Anabaptist-type people tried to establish a city composed only of Anabaptists. The leaders killed internal opposition and practiced polygamy. They ran out of food and were defeated by Catholic forces after betrayal by someone inside the city.

Cautious involvement: The government has been ordained by God to control the evil in the world. If the government could carry out this function with Christian love, then the government could truly be considered Christian. However, most Anabaptists concluded that governmental authority could not be exercised in love and should, therefore, be avoided. People in this camp include Hans Denck, Marpeck, and Menno Simons. The Dordrecht Confession also fits this category.

Summary: The Anabaptist movement in the 16th century moved from a variety of positions to what we now refer to as a non-resistant and non-participation in government position, which has been the general Anabaptist/Mennonite position of more conservative groups.

Related Sermons:


  1. The Anabaptist View of Scripture
  2. Anabaptist Distinctives – Part 1
  3. The Anabaptist View of the Church
  4. Anabaptist View of the Trinity
  5. Anabaptist Distinctives – Part 2

Filed Under: Milo Zehr, Sunday Morning Message Tagged With: Acts, Ezra, John, Matthew, Romans

Search the Site

Subscribe to the Podcast

Apple PodcastsAndroidRSS

Sermons by Preacher

Brian Yoder Calvin Yoder Carl Heatwole Dale Heisey Dan Freed Delvin Yoder Duane Nisly Edward Yoder Eli Yoder Gabriel Yoder Galen Yoder Glenn Horst Ivan Weaver Jake Troyer Jeff Yoder Jerrill Schrock John D Martin John Waldron Josh Good Ken Ranck Leon Yoder Lowell Miller Lowell Yoder Mark Yoder Melvin Lehman Merle Burkholder Michael Yoder Milo Zehr Nathan Bange Nathan Good Nathan Zook Phil Beiler Raun Schrock Rich Bowman Ricky Bowman Sam Troyer Sonny Yoder Special Meetings Stephen Gingrich Steve Yoder Sunday Evening Message Sunday Morning Message Uncategorized Wayne Schrock Wesley King

Sermons By Reference

1 Corinthians 1 John 1 Kings 1 Peter 1 Samuel 1 Thessalonians 1 Timothy 2 Chronicles 2 Corinthians 2 Kings 2 Peter 2 Timothy Acts Colossians Daniel Deuteronomy Ecclesiastes Ephesians Exodus Ezekiel Galatians Genesis Hebrews Isaiah James Jeremiah Job John Joshua Judges Leviticus Luke Malachi Mark Matthew Nehemiah Numbers Philippians Proverbs Psalm Psalms Revelation Romans Ruth Titus
BMC | Site by EY-PHOTO-WEB